FireStream 9250 vs Iris Graphics 540
In this comparison between FireStream 9250 and Iris Graphics 540 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9250 will be the best choice, for others Iris Graphics 540 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9250
Iris Graphics 540 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 540 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 540 here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9250 | Iris Graphics 540 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | eDRAM |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 64 MB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 900% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 540.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 540 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Graphics 540 has 63 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 540 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Iris Graphics 540 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 325 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 540.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 540 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 120% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Battlefield 5 is 111% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 30% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 18% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Dota 2 is 25% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Far Cry 5 is 140% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Fortnite is 57% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Forza Horizon 4 is 72% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Grand Theft Auto V is 38% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Minecraft is 8% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9250 | Iris Graphics 540 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Gen. 9 Skylake |
| Code name | RV770 | Skylake GT3e |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 1 September 2015 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 50.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.97 |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |