FireStream 9250 vs Iris Graphics 6100
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9250 and Iris Graphics 6100. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9250 and Iris Graphics 6100. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9250
Iris Graphics 6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 6100 here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9250 | Iris Graphics 6100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 900% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 6100 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 6100 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Iris Graphics 6100 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 325 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 6100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Battlefield 5 is 10% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 27% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Dota 2 is 8% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Far Cry 5 is 40% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Fortnite is 4% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 9% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 16% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Minecraft is 6% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 10% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9250 | Iris Graphics 6100 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
| Code name | RV770 | Broadwell GT3 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 5 January 2015 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 52.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.80 |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |