FireStream 9250 vs Iris Plus Graphics 640
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9250 and Iris Plus Graphics 640. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9250 and Iris Plus Graphics 640. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9250
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 32 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 900% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 31 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 325 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 80% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Battlefield 5 is 66% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 24% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Dota 2 is 9% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Far Cry 5 is 80% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Fortnite is 28% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Forza Horizon 4 is 45% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Grand Theft Auto V is 14% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Minecraft is 3% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 62% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in World of Tanks is 9% more, than FireStream 9250. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | RV770 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 3 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 800 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 52.80 |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.103 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 650M
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 640
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce GT 650M
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce GT 640
- FireStream 9250 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce GTX 660M