FireStream 9250 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9250 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9250 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9250
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | eDRAM |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 128 MB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 233% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 127 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 425 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 111% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 34% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 18% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 32% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 140% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 61% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 81% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 42% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 175% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 10% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than FireStream 9250. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
Code name | RV770 | Haswell GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 5 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 800 | 40 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 200 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 392 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 22 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 52.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.80 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 650M
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 640
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GT 650M
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GT 640
- FireStream 9250 vs Radeon RX 550X
- FireStream 9250 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book