FireStream 9250 vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9250 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9250 stacks up against Iris Pro Graphics 6200, check out specs charts below.
FireStream 9250
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 900% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 325 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Battlefield 5 is 10% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 30% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Dota 2 is 8% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Far Cry 5 is 40% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Fortnite is 4% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
FireStream 9250 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 16% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
FireStream 9250 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
Code name | RV770 | Broadwell GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 2 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 800 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 40.80 |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.80 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 650M
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 640
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs GeForce GT 650M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs GeForce GT 640
- FireStream 9250 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- FireStream 9250 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2