FireStream 9250 vs Quadro 2000D
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9250 and Quadro 2000D. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9250 and Quadro 2000D. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9250
Quadro 2000D
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | Quadro 2000D | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 62 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | 2x DVI |
- FireStream 9250 has 141% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000D.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FireStream 9250 and Quadro 2000D have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Quadro 2000D - with Fermi.
- Both graphics cards have the same core clock speed.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000D - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 614 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Battlefield 5 is 11% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Dota 2 is 8% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Far Cry 5 is 25% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Fortnite is 6% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Minecraft is 6% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
FireStream 9250 and Quadro 2000D have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Quadro 2000D. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | Quadro 2000D | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Fermi |
Code name | RV770 | GF106 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 5 October 2011 |
Pipelines | 800 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 625 MHz |
Transistor count | 956 million | 1,170 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 20.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
Length | 178 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 2600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |