FireStream 9250 vs Quadro FX 4800
When choosing between FireStream 9250 and Quadro FX 4800, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9250 and Quadro FX 4800.
FireStream 9250
Quadro FX 4800
Main Specs
| FireStream 9250 | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1536 MB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 150 Watt.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1535 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 23 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- FireStream 9250 and Quadro FX 4800 are manufactured by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 386 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Battlefield 5 is 25% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Dota 2 is 8% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Far Cry 5 is 25% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Fortnite is 6% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Forza Horizon 4 is 30% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Minecraft is 6% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| FireStream 9250 and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in World of Tanks is 13% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9250 | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | RV770 | GT200B |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 11 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 602 MHz |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 38.53 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |