FireStream 9250 vs Quadro K2200M

When choosing between FireStream 9250 and Quadro K2200M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9250 and Quadro K2200M.

FireStream 9250

Quadro K2200M

Main Specs

	FireStream 9250	Quadro K2200M
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	65 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI	No outputs

FireStream 9250 has 130% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Quadro K2200M has 1 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 42 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K2200M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 3026 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	20−22
ultra / 1080p	1−2	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	12−14	35−40
medium / 1080p	5−6	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 380% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	7−8	30−35
ultra / 1080p	5−6	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−12
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	18−20	65−70
medium / 1080p	7−8	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 355% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	35−40	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FireStream 9250 and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	120−130	230−240
medium / 768p	95−100	200−210
ultra / 1080p	45−50	110−120
QHD / 1440p	35−40	85−90
4K / 2160p	18−20	45−50
high / 768p	70−75	160−170
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 115% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	80−85	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	50−55
medium / 1080p	50−55	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	75−80	120−130
medium / 768p	50−55	100−110
ultra / 1080p	27−30	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 96% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	3−4	24−27
ultra / 1080p	3−4	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	1−2	7−8
low / 720p	12−14	50−55
medium / 1080p	4−5	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 420% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	10−12	30−35
ultra / 1080p	6−7	24−27
QHD / 1440p	3−4	14−16
low / 720p	50−55	120−130
medium / 1080p	14−16	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 217% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	8−9	30−35
ultra / 1080p	6−7	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	12−14
low / 720p	20−22	65−70
medium / 1080p	10−11	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 263% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	50−55	100−110
medium / 768p	−	90−95
high / 1080p	8−9	40−45
ultra / 1080p	3−4	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
medium / 720p	40−45	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 157% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	2−3	12−14
ultra / 1080p	0−1	10−11
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	7−8	40−45
medium / 1080p	4−5	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	85−90	120−130
high / 1080p	85−90	−
ultra / 1080p	85−90	−
4K / 2160p	75−80	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 43% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	27−30	70−75
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	6−7	14−16
ultra / 1080p	4−5	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
4K / 2160p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	7−8	35−40
medium / 1080p	7−8	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 250% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	16−18	70−75
medium / 768p	12−14	45−50
high / 1080p	6−7	24−27
ultra / 1080p	4−5	14−16
4K / 2160p	2−3	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 312% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	80−85	90−95
medium / 768p	40−45	60−65
ultra / 1080p	16−18	40−45
high / 768p	30−35	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 46% more, than FireStream 9250.

Full Specs

	FireStream 9250	Quadro K2200M
Architecture	TeraScale	Maxwell
Code name	RV770	GM107
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	16 June 2008	19 July 2014
Pipelines	800	640
Core clock speed	625 MHz	667 MHz
Transistor count	956 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	25.00	26.68
Floating-point performance	1,000.0 gflops	853.8 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1986 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	63.55 GB/s	80 GB/s
DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12
Shader Model	4.1	5
OpenGL	3.3	4.5
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		5.0
Optimus		+
Display Port		1.2
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
nView Display Management		+

FireStream 9250 vs Quadro K2200M

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares