FireStream 9250 vs Quadro K3000M
When choosing between FireStream 9250 and Quadro K3000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9250 and Quadro K3000M.
FireStream 9250
Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9250 | Quadro K3000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 100% more power consumption, than Quadro K3000M.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K3000M has 3 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Quadro K3000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 29 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K3000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 814 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Battlefield 5 is 77% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Dota 2 is 23% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Far Cry 5 is 120% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Fortnite is 47% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 63% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Minecraft is 3% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 83% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 75% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in World of Tanks is 11% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9250 | Quadro K3000M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Kepler |
| Code name | RV770 | N14E-Q1 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 1 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 576 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 654 MHz |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 31.39 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 753.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 24 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |