FireStream 9250 vs Quadro K4000
In this comparison between FireStream 9250 and Quadro K4000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9250 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K4000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9250
Main Specs
FireStream 9250
Quadro K4000
Power consumption (TDP)
150 Watt
80 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
3 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Check Price
FireStream 9250 has 87% more power consumption, than Quadro K4000.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro K4000 has 2 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Quadro K4000 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K4000 is 185 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K4000 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K4000 is 3630 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
14−16
ultra / 1080p
1−2
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
12−14
27−30
medium / 1080p
5−6
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 240% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p
7−8
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
7−8
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Battlefield 5 is 211% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
35−40
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4000.
low / 768p
120−130
200−210
medium / 768p
95−100
170−180
ultra / 1080p
45−50
90−95
QHD / 1440p
35−40
50−55
4K / 2160p
18−20
30−33
high / 768p
70−75
130−140
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 74% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p
80−85
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
35−40
medium / 1080p
50−55
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro K4000.
low / 768p
75−80
100−110
medium / 768p
50−55
90−95
ultra / 1080p
27−30
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Dota 2 is 63% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p
3−4
16−18
ultra / 1080p
3−4
14−16
4K / 2160p
1−2
5−6
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
4−5
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Far Cry 5 is 260% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p
10−12
21−24
ultra / 1080p
6−7
18−20
QHD / 1440p
3−4
16−18
low / 720p
50−55
90−95
medium / 1080p
14−16
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Fortnite is 129% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p
8−9
21−24
ultra / 1080p
6−7
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
low / 720p
20−22
45−50
medium / 1080p
10−11
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 154% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p
50−55
80−85
medium / 768p
−
70−75
high / 1080p
8−9
27−30
ultra / 1080p
3−4
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 90% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p
2−3
9−10
ultra / 1080p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
7−8
24−27
medium / 1080p
4−5
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
85−90
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
100−110
4K / 2160p
75−80
−
medium / 1080p
−
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Minecraft is 26% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p
14−16
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
low / 720p
27−30
50−55
medium / 1080p
14−16
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 64% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p
6−7
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
7−8
24−27
medium / 1080p
7−8
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 166% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p
16−18
50−55
medium / 768p
12−14
30−35
high / 1080p
6−7
16−18
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−11
4K / 2160p
2−3
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p
80−85
100−105
medium / 768p
40−45
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
30−35
high / 768p
30−35
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in World of Tanks is 44% more, than FireStream 9250.
Full Specs
FireStream 9250
Quadro K4000
Architecture
TeraScale
Kepler
Code name
RV770
GK106
Type
Desktop
Workstation
Release date
16 June 2008
1 March 2013
Pipelines
800
768
Core clock speed
625 MHz
810 MHz
Transistor count
956 million
2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
25.00
51.84
Floating-point performance
1,000.0 gflops
1,244 gflops
Length
241 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
192 Bit
Memory clock speed
1986 MHz
5616 MHz
Memory bandwidth
63.55 GB/s
134.8 GB/s
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
4.1
5.1
OpenGL
3.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)
0.21 kh/s
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
61 Mh/s
Check Price
