FireStream 9250 vs Quadro K4000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9250 and Quadro K4000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9250 and Quadro K4000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9250
Quadro K4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4000M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | Quadro K4000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 50% more power consumption, than Quadro K4000M.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K4000M has 3 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Quadro K4000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 25 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K4000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K4000M is 814 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 160% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Battlefield 5 is 144% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 45% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Dota 2 is 42% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Far Cry 5 is 180% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Fortnite is 76% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 109% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 52% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Minecraft is 12% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 116% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 125% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in World of Tanks is 27% more, than FireStream 9250. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | Quadro K4000M | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Kepler |
Code name | RV770 | N14E-Q3 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 1 June 2012 |
Pipelines | 800 | 960 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 600 MHz |
Transistor count | 956 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 48.08 |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 1,154 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 2800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 37 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 650M
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 640
- Quadro K4000M vs GeForce GT 650M
- Quadro K4000M vs GeForce GT 640
- FireStream 9250 vs Radeon RX Vega 11
- FireStream 9250 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000
- Quadro K4000M vs Radeon RX Vega 11
- Quadro K4000M vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000