FireStream 9250 vs Quadro K5000M
When choosing between FireStream 9250 and Quadro K5000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9250 and Quadro K5000M.
FireStream 9250
Quadro K5000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K5000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K5000M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | Quadro K5000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 50% more power consumption, than Quadro K5000M.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K5000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K5000M has 3 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K5000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Quadro K5000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K5000M is 81 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K5000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K5000M is 1014 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Battlefield 5 is 266% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K5000M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 86% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro K5000M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Dota 2 is 78% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Far Cry 5 is 320% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Fortnite is 164% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 218% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 119% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Metro Exodus is 375% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Minecraft is 32% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 237% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in World of Tanks is 51% more, than FireStream 9250. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | Quadro K5000M | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Kepler |
Code name | RV770 | N14E-Q5 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 1 June 2012 |
Pipelines | 800 | 1344 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 706 MHz |
Transistor count | 956 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 67.31 |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 1,615 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 51 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |