FireStream 9250 vs Quadro K620M
In this comparison between FireStream 9250 and Quadro K620M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9250 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K620M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9250
Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K620M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9250 | Quadro K620M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 400% more power consumption, than Quadro K620M.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K620M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K620M has 1 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K620M - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Quadro K620M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 404 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K620M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K620M is 14 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Battlefield 5 is 11% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9250 and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Dota 2 is 3% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Fortnite is 11% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| FireStream 9250 and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| FireStream 9250 and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Minecraft is 12% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| FireStream 9250 and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| FireStream 9250 and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| FireStream 9250 and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9250 | Quadro K620M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Maxwell |
| Code name | RV770 | GM108 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 1 March 2015 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 17.98 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |