FireStream 9250 vs Quadro M1200
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9250 and Quadro M1200. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9250 and Quadro M1200. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9250
Quadro M1200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1200 here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9250 | Quadro M1200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 233% more power consumption, than Quadro M1200.
- Quadro M1200 has 3 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M1200 - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Quadro M1200 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M1200 is 366 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro M1200 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M1200 is 3014 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Battlefield 5 is 311% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9250 and Quadro M1200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 106% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Dota 2 is 90% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Far Cry 5 is 380% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Fortnite is 194% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 254% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 138% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Metro Exodus is 425% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Minecraft is 32% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 233% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 275% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in World of Tanks is 46% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9250 | Quadro M1200 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Maxwell |
| Code name | RV770 | N17P-Q1 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 13 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 991 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 1870 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.00 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |