FireStream 9250 vs Quadro M620
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9250 and Quadro M620. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9250 and Quadro M620. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9250
Quadro M620 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M620 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M620 here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9250 | Quadro M620 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 400% more power consumption, than Quadro M620.
- Quadro M620 has 1 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M620 - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Quadro M620 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M620 is 393 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro M620 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M620 is 3026 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 260% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Battlefield 5 is 244% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 75% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Dota 2 is 65% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Far Cry 5 is 280% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Fortnite is 147% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Forza Horizon 4 is 181% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Grand Theft Auto V is 104% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Metro Exodus is 325% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Minecraft is 26% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in World of Tanks is 46% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9250 | Quadro M620 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Maxwell |
| Code name | RV770 | |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 13 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 1018 MHz |
| Transistor count | 956 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.00 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |