FireStream 9250 vs Radeon HD 6950M
When comparing FireStream 9250 and Radeon HD 6950M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9250 and Radeon HD 6950M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9250
Radeon HD 6950M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6950M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6950M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | Radeon HD 6950M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 200% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 6950M.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon HD 6950M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Radeon HD 6950M has 1 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 6950M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon HD 6950M - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 45 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6950M.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 6950M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 1086 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6950M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 120% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Battlefield 5 is 111% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 18% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Dota 2 is 25% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Far Cry 5 is 140% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Fortnite is 57% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Forza Horizon 4 is 72% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Grand Theft Auto V is 38% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Minecraft is 8% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in World of Tanks is 20% more, than FireStream 9250. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | Radeon HD 6950M | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Terascale 2 |
Code name | RV770 | Blackcomb Pro |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 6 January 2011 |
Pipelines | 800 | 960 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 580 MHz |
Transistor count | 956 million | 1,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 27.84 |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 1,113.6 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |