FireStream 9250 vs Radeon R7 M340
When choosing between FireStream 9250 and Radeon R7 M340, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9250 and Radeon R7 M340.
FireStream 9250
Radeon R7 M340 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M340 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M340 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | Radeon R7 M340 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M340 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R7 M340 has 3 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M340 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon R7 M340 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M340 is 396 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M340 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 986 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M340.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Radeon R7 M340. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M340 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | − |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 203% more, than Radeon R7 M340. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon R7 M340. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Dota 2 is 124% more, than Radeon R7 M340. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Fortnite is 136% more, than Radeon R7 M340. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 193% more, than Radeon R7 M340. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Minecraft is 64% more, than Radeon R7 M340. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than Radeon R7 M340. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
low / 768p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | − |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in World of Tanks is 108% more, than Radeon R7 M340. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | Radeon R7 M340 | |
Architecture | TeraScale | GCN |
Code name | RV770 | Meso Pro DDR3 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 16 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 800 | 320 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 1021 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1021 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 17.16 |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 549.1 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 16 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | + |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 74 Mh/s | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Check Price |