FireStream 9250 vs Radeon R7 M370
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9250 and Radeon R7 M370. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9250 and Radeon R7 M370. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9250
Radeon R7 M370 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M370 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M370 here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9250 | Radeon R7 M370 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M370 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R7 M370 has 3 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M370 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon R7 M370 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M370 is 250 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M370 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 986 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M370.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Battlefield 5 is 44% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 24% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Far Cry 5 is 80% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Fortnite is 23% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 36% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| FireStream 9250 and Radeon R7 M370 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9250 | Radeon R7 M370 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | GCN |
| Code name | RV770 | Litho |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 6 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 875 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 960 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 23.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 73.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 70 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |