FireStream 9250 vs Radeon R9 A375

When comparing FireStream 9250 and Radeon R9 A375, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9250 and Radeon R9 A375 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FireStream 9250

Radeon R9 A375

Main Specs

	FireStream 9250	Radeon R9 A375
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI	No outputs

FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 A375 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon R9 A375 has 1 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
Core clock speed of Radeon R9 A375 is 275 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 A375 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 1982 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	2−3
ultra / 1080p	1−2	1−2
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	12−14	12−14
medium / 1080p	5−6	4−5
FireStream 9250 and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey.
high / 1080p	7−8	−
ultra / 1080p	5−6	5−6
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	18−20	16−18
medium / 1080p	7−8	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Battlefield 5 is 11% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	35−40	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	120−130	120−130
medium / 768p	95−100	95−100
ultra / 1080p	45−50	40−45
QHD / 1440p	35−40	21−24
4K / 2160p	18−20	16−18
high / 768p	70−75	65−70
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p	80−85	65−70
ultra / 1080p	18−20	20−22
medium / 1080p	50−55	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p	75−80	75−80
medium / 768p	50−55	45−50
ultra / 1080p	27−30	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Dota 2 is 6% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p	3−4	2−3
ultra / 1080p	3−4	2−3
4K / 2160p	1−2	2−3
low / 720p	12−14	10−12
medium / 1080p	4−5	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Far Cry 5 is 25% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p	10−12	10−11
ultra / 1080p	6−7	5−6
QHD / 1440p	3−4	4−5
low / 720p	50−55	50−55
medium / 1080p	14−16	10−12
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Fortnite is 6% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p	8−9	5−6
ultra / 1080p	6−7	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	20−22	18−20
medium / 1080p	10−11	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	8−9	4−5
ultra / 1080p	3−4	2−3
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	40−45	35−40
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p	2−3	2−3
ultra / 1080p	0−1	0−1
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	7−8	4−5
medium / 1080p	4−5	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p	85−90	85−90
high / 1080p	85−90	80−85
ultra / 1080p	85−90	−
4K / 2160p	75−80	75−80
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Minecraft is 2% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	12−14	12−14
low / 720p	27−30	27−30
medium / 1080p	14−16	14−16
FireStream 9250 and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
high / 1080p	6−7	−
ultra / 1080p	4−5	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
4K / 2160p	0−1	−
low / 720p	7−8	6−7
medium / 1080p	7−8	−
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p	16−18	10−11
medium / 768p	12−14	8−9
high / 1080p	6−7	4−5
ultra / 1080p	4−5	4−5
4K / 2160p	2−3	1−2
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p	80−85	75−80
medium / 768p	40−45	35−40
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
high / 768p	30−35	30−33
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than Radeon R9 A375.

Full Specs

	FireStream 9250	Radeon R9 A375
Architecture	TeraScale	GCN 1.0
Code name	RV770	Venus
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	16 June 2008	no data
Pipelines	800	640
Core clock speed	625 MHz	900 MHz
Boost Clock		925 MHz
Transistor count	956 million	1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	25.00	37.00
Floating-point performance	1,000.0 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1986 MHz	4.5 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	63.55 GB/s	72 GB/s
DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	4.1	5.1
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2

FireStream 9250 vs Radeon R9 A375

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares