FireStream 9250 vs Radeon RX 480 mobile
In this comparison between FireStream 9250 and Radeon RX 480 mobile you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9250 will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 480 mobile will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9250
Radeon RX 480 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 480 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 480 mobile here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9250 | Radeon RX 480 mobile | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 50% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 480 mobile.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon RX 480 mobile uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Radeon RX 480 mobile has 7 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 480 mobile - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon RX 480 mobile - with Polaris.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 480 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 480 mobile is 6014 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 220% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 62% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 1% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Dota 2 is 59% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 220% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Fortnite is 123% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 154% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 76% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Minecraft is 20% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 55% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 133% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 162% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in World of Tanks is 34% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9250 | Radeon RX 480 mobile | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Polaris |
| Code name | RV770 | Polaris |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 1 August 2016 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 2304 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1077 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 5,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 155.1 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 4,963 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 8000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 256.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 650M
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 640
- Radeon RX 480 mobile vs GeForce GT 650M
- Radeon RX 480 mobile vs GeForce GT 640
- FireStream 9250 vs Tesla C2075
- FireStream 9250 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000
- Radeon RX 480 mobile vs Tesla C2075
- Radeon RX 480 mobile vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000