FireStream 9250 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000
In this comparison between FireStream 9250 and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9250 will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9250
Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 - with Vega.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 - by 7 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 320% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Battlefield 5 is 311% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 96% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Dota 2 is 86% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Far Cry 5 is 360% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Fortnite is 182% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 236% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 138% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Metro Exodus is 425% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Minecraft is 32% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 262% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in World of Tanks is 44% more, than FireStream 9250. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Vega |
Code name | RV770 | Vega Renoir |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 7 January 2020 |
Pipelines | 800 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 4.1 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 650M
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 640
- Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 vs GeForce GT 650M
- Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 vs GeForce GT 640
- FireStream 9250 vs Radeon RX 480 mobile
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 590
- Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 vs Radeon RX 480 mobile
- Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 vs GeForce GTX 590