FireStream 9250 vs Radeon Vega 11 mobile
When choosing between FireStream 9250 and Radeon Vega 11 mobile, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9250 and Radeon Vega 11 mobile.
FireStream 9250
Radeon Vega 11 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Vega 11 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Vega 11 mobile here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9250 | Radeon Vega 11 mobile | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 900% more power consumption, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Vega 11 mobile uses IGP interface.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Vega 11 mobile - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon Vega 11 mobile - with GCN 5.0.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Vega 11 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Vega 11 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Vega 11 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 33% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9250 and Radeon Vega 11 mobile have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 1% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Vega 11 mobile in Dota 2 is 5% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Vega 11 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 20% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Vega 11 mobile in Fortnite is 17% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Vega 11 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 9% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Vega 11 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Vega 11 mobile in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Vega 11 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Vega 11 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Vega 11 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 12% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9250 | Radeon Vega 11 mobile | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | GCN 5.0 |
| Code name | RV770 | Picasso |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 6 January 2019 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 704 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1400 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 4,940 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 61.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 650M
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 640
- Radeon Vega 11 mobile vs GeForce GT 650M
- Radeon Vega 11 mobile vs GeForce GT 640
- FireStream 9250 vs FirePro M5950
- FireStream 9250 vs Radeon HD 4870 X2
- Radeon Vega 11 mobile vs FirePro M5950
- Radeon Vega 11 mobile vs Radeon HD 4870 X2