FirePro M4150 vs FireStream 9270
When comparing FirePro M4150 and FireStream 9270, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M4150 and FireStream 9270 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro M4150
FireStream 9270
Main Specs
FirePro M4150 | FireStream 9270 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and FireStream 9270 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FireStream 9270 has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and FireStream 9270 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 35 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and FireStream 9270 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Battlefield 5 is 55% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Fortnite is 16% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Forza Horizon 4 is 62% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Minecraft is 6% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 720p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than FirePro M4150. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4150 | FireStream 9270 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Opal | RV770 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 16 October 2013 | 13 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 384 | 800 |
Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 750 MHz |
Transistor count | 950 million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 30.00 |
Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 1,200.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |