FirePro S10000 vs FireStream 9270
When comparing FirePro S10000 and FireStream 9270, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S10000 and FireStream 9270 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S10000
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
FireStream 9270
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
FirePro S10000 | FireStream 9270 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | 160 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI |
- FirePro S10000 has 368% more power consumption, than FireStream 9270.
- FirePro S10000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and FireStream 9270 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro S10000 has 4 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro S10000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and FireStream 9270 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 75 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FirePro S10000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and FireStream 9270 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 1400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 500% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Battlefield 5 is 423% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 160% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Dota 2 is 101% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Far Cry 5 is 487% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Fortnite is 328% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
medium / 720p | − | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 260% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Minecraft is 46% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 253% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 420% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 21−24 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 14−16 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 520% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than FireStream 9270. |
Full Specs
FirePro S10000 | FireStream 9270 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Tahiti | RV770 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 12 November 2012 | 13 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 4096 | 800 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 750 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 106.4 | 30.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | 1,200.0 gflops |
Length | 305 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 480 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |