FirePro S9000 vs FireStream 9270
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro S9000 and FireStream 9270, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro S9000 stacks up against FireStream 9270, check out specs charts below.
FirePro S9000
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
FireStream 9270
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
FirePro S9000 | FireStream 9270 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 160 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI |
- FirePro S9000 has 118% more power consumption, than FireStream 9270.
- FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and FireStream 9270 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro S9000 has 4 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and FireStream 9270 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 150 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and FireStream 9270 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 1900 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 500% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 423% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 160% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 101% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 487% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 328% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
medium / 720p | − | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 260% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 46% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 253% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 420% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 21−24 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 14−16 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 520% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than FireStream 9270. |
Full Specs
FirePro S9000 | FireStream 9270 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Tahiti | RV770 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 24 August 2012 | 13 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 800 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 750 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 30.00 |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 1,200.0 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |