FireStream 9270 vs GeForce 825M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9270 and GeForce 825M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9270 and GeForce 825M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9270
GeForce 825M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 825M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 825M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | GeForce 825M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 384% more power consumption, than GeForce 825M.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce 825M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FireStream 9270 and GeForce 825M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and GeForce 825M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce 825M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 825M is 100 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce 825M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 1800 MHz higher, than GeForce 825M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 650% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9270 and GeForce 825M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 228% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 825M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Dota 2 is 94% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Fortnite is 159% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Minecraft is 29% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 90% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | − |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in World of Tanks is 100% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | GeForce 825M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Kepler |
| Code name | RV770 | GK208 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 27 January 2014 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 941 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 915 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 30.11 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 722.7 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |