FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GT 445M
When choosing between FireStream 9270 and GeForce GT 445M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9270 and GeForce GT 445M.
FireStream 9270
GeForce GT 445M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 445M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 445M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | GeForce GT 445M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 357% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 445M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GT 445M has 1 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GT 445M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GT 445M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 445M is 430 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GT 445M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 2350 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 445M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Battlefield 5 is 180% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 445M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 445M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Dota 2 is 29% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Fortnite is 46% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Grand Theft Auto V is 48% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Metro Exodus is 900% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Minecraft is 5% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 445M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 33% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 233% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 250% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in World of Tanks is 13% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | GeForce GT 445M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Fermi |
| Code name | RV770 | N11E-GE |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 3 September 2010 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 144 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 1180 MHz |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 1,170 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 10.6 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 339.8 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 60.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 API |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 144 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |