FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GT 645M
When comparing FireStream 9270 and GeForce GT 645M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9270 and GeForce GT 645M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9270
GeForce GT 645M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 645M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 645M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9270 | GeForce GT 645M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 32 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3\GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 400% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 645M.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GT 645M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FireStream 9270 and GeForce GT 645M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GT 645M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GT 645M - with Kepler.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GT 645M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 1800 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 645M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 80% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 645M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 22% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 645M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Dota 2 is 23% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Fortnite is 35% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Forza Horizon 4 is 87% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Grand Theft Auto V is 38% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Minecraft is 5% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 645M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 140% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than GeForce GT 645M. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9270 | GeForce GT 645M | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Kepler |
Code name | RV770 | N13P-GS |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 November 2008 | 22 March 2012 |
Pipelines | 800 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 22.7 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 544.5 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
3D Blu-Ray | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 19 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9270 vs GeForce 930MX
- FireStream 9270 vs FirePro V5900
- GeForce GT 645M vs GeForce 930MX
- GeForce GT 645M vs FirePro V5900
- FireStream 9270 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- FireStream 9270 vs Quadro CX
- GeForce GT 645M vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- GeForce GT 645M vs Quadro CX