FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GT 735M
In this comparison between FireStream 9270 and GeForce GT 735M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9270 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GT 735M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9270
GeForce GT 735M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 735M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 735M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9270 | GeForce GT 735M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 33 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 384% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 735M.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GT 735M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FireStream 9270 and GeForce GT 735M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GT 735M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GT 735M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 175 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 735M.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GT 735M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 1800 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 735M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than GeForce GT 735M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 735M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 228% more, than GeForce GT 735M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 735M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Dota 2 is 141% more, than GeForce GT 735M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Fortnite is 159% more, than GeForce GT 735M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than GeForce GT 735M. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Minecraft is 19% more, than GeForce GT 735M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than GeForce GT 735M. | ||
low / 720p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
low / 768p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | − |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in World of Tanks is 100% more, than GeForce GT 735M. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9270 | GeForce GT 735M | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Kepler |
Code name | RV770 | N14M-LP |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 November 2008 | 1 April 2013 |
Pipelines | 800 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 575 MHz |
Boost Clock | 889 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 915 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 18.40 |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 441.6 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 1800 - 2000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 39 Mh/s | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |