FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q
In this comparison between FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9270 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9270
GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 113% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q has 2 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q is 249 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q is 3400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 250% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 215% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 113% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 46% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Dota 2 is 82% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 237% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Fortnite is 171% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 184% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 7−8 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 134% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 320% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Minecraft is 35% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 169% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 230% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in World of Tanks is 50% more, than FireStream 9270. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Pascal |
Code name | RV770 | N17P-G0 Max-Q |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 November 2008 | 3 January 2018 |
Pipelines | 800 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 999 - 1189 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1139 - 1328 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 3,300 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 53.12 |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 1,700 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 112.1 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 6.1 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9270 vs GeForce 930MX
- FireStream 9270 vs FirePro V5900
- GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q vs GeForce 930MX
- GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q vs FirePro V5900
- FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GTX 880M
- FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GTX 660
- GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q vs GeForce GTX 880M
- GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q vs GeForce GTX 660