FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GTX 485M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 485M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9270 stacks up against GeForce GTX 485M, check out specs charts below.
FireStream 9270
GeForce GTX 485M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 485M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 485M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 485M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 60% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 485M.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 485M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 485M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 485M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GTX 485M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 366 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 485M.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 485M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 2100 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 485M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Battlefield 5 is 92% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 485M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Dota 2 is 40% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Fortnite is 78% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Forza Horizon 4 is 93% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Grand Theft Auto V is 52% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Metro Exodus is 140% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Minecraft is 16% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 125% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in World of Tanks is 38% more, than FireStream 9270. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 485M | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Fermi |
Code name | RV770 | N12E-GTX-A1 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 November 2008 | 6 January 2010 |
Pipelines | 800 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 384 |
Transistor count | 956 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 36.8 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 96.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |