FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GTX 660M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 660M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 660M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9270
GeForce GTX 660M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 660M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 660M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 660M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 220% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 660M.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 660M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 660M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 660M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GTX 660M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 660M is 85 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 660M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 1600 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 660M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 28% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Battlefield 5 is 15% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 660M have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Far Cry 5 is 12% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Fortnite is 17% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Forza Horizon 4 is 13% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Minecraft is 3% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in World of Tanks is 11% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 660M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Kepler |
| Code name | RV770 | N13E-GE |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 22 March 2012 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 835 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 950 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 30.4 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 729.6 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 64.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 API |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 36 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |