FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GTX 670M
In this comparison between FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 670M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9270 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 670M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9270
GeForce GTX 670M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 670M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 113% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 670M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 670M has 1 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 670M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GTX 670M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 152 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 670M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 2100 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 42% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Battlefield 5 is 30% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 22% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Dota 2 is 14% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Far Cry 5 is 37% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Fortnite is 32% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Forza Horizon 4 is 40% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Metro Exodus is 60% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Minecraft is 5% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 40% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 50% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in World of Tanks is 21% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 670M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Fermi |
| Code name | RV770 | N13E-GS1-LP |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 22 March 2012 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 336 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 598 MHz |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 1,950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 33.5 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 803.7 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 72.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 API |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 336 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 53 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |