FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GTX 765M
When comparing FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 765M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 765M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9270
GeForce GTX 765M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 765M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 765M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 765M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 113% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 765M.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 765M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 765M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 765M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GTX 765M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 765M is 100 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 765M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 1600 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 765M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 71% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Battlefield 5 is 61% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 765M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 33% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Dota 2 is 22% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Fortnite is 53% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Forza Horizon 4 is 60% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Grand Theft Auto V is 34% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Minecraft is 12% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 70% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in World of Tanks is 26% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 765M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Kepler |
| Code name | RV770 | N14-GE |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 30 May 2013 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 863 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 2,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 55.23 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 1,326 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 64.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 API |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 24 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |