FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GTX 880M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 880M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 880M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9270
GeForce GTX 880M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 880M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 880M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 880M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 122 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 31% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 880M.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 880M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 880M has 6 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 880M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GTX 880M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 880M is 204 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 880M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 250% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Battlefield 5 is 215% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 113% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 46% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Dota 2 is 82% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Far Cry 5 is 237% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Fortnite is 171% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Forza Horizon 4 is 192% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 7−8 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Grand Theft Auto V is 134% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Metro Exodus is 320% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Minecraft is 35% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 169% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 240% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in World of Tanks is 50% more, than FireStream 9270. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 880M | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Kepler |
Code name | RV770 | N15E-GX-A2 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 November 2008 | 12 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 800 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 954 MHz |
Boost Clock | 993 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 127.1 |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 3,050 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 96 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |