FireStream 9270 vs GeForce MX150
In this comparison between FireStream 9270 and GeForce MX150 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9270 will be the best choice, for others GeForce MX150 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9270
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce MX150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX150 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9270 | GeForce MX150 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 10 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 1500% more power consumption, than GeForce MX150.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce MX150 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce MX150 has 2 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX150 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce MX150 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 718 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce MX150 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 2408 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Battlefield 5 is 92% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9270 and GeForce MX150 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Dota 2 is 40% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Fortnite is 78% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 86% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 52% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Metro Exodus is 120% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Minecraft is 16% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 125% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than FireStream 9270. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9270 | GeForce MX150 | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Pascal |
Code name | RV770 | N17S-G1 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 November 2008 | 16 May 2017 |
Pipelines | 800 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 1468 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1532 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 1,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 24.91 |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 1,127 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 40.1 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 6.1 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9270 vs GeForce 930MX
- FireStream 9270 vs FirePro V5900
- GeForce MX150 vs GeForce 930MX
- GeForce MX150 vs FirePro V5900
- FireStream 9270 vs Iris Graphics 540
- FireStream 9270 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
- GeForce MX150 vs Iris Graphics 540
- GeForce MX150 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000