FireStream 9270 vs GRID K240Q

When comparing FireStream 9270 and GRID K240Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9270 and GRID K240Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FireStream 9270

GRID K240Q

Main Specs

	FireStream 9270	GRID K240Q
Power consumption (TDP)	160 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI	No outputs

GRID K240Q has 40% more power consumption, than FireStream 9270.
FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K240Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
FireStream 9270 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GRID K240Q - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 5 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GRID K240Q - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 1400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	5−6	10−11
ultra / 1080p	2−3	6−7
QHD / 1440p	2−3	1−2
low / 720p	14−16	21−24
medium / 1080p	7−8	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	10−11	16−18
ultra / 1080p	8−9	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	35−40
medium / 1080p	10−12	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 69% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FireStream 9270 and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	130−140	170−180
medium / 768p	100−110	140−150
ultra / 1080p	50−55	75−80
QHD / 1440p	27−30	40−45
4K / 2160p	12−14	30−33
high / 768p	75−80	110−120
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 42% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	50−55	55−60
ultra / 1080p	18−20	27−30
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	80−85	95−100
medium / 768p	55−60	75−80
ultra / 1080p	30−35	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 29% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	7−8	12−14
ultra / 1080p	5−6	10−12
4K / 2160p	5−6	4−5
low / 720p	16−18	27−30
medium / 1080p	8−9	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	7−8	18−20
ultra / 1080p	0−1	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	55−60	75−80
medium / 1080p	18−20	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 57% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	10−11	18−20
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
QHD / 1440p	−	4−5
4K / 2160p	8−9	−
low / 720p	21−24	35−40
medium / 1080p	12−14	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 73% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	50−55	65−70
medium / 768p	−	60−65
high / 1080p	10−12	20−22
ultra / 1080p	5−6	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
medium / 720p	45−50	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 39% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	3−4	7−8
ultra / 1080p	1−2	5−6
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	10−11	20−22
medium / 1080p	5−6	9−10
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	90−95	100−110
ultra / 1080p	80−85	90−95
medium / 1080p	−	100−105
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 12% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	6−7	18−20
ultra / 1080p	2−3	16−18
4K / 2160p	0−1	−
low / 720p	27−30	40−45
medium / 1080p	10−11	20−22
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	10−11	20−22
medium / 1080p	9−10	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 70% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	21−24	35−40
medium / 768p	14−16	24−27
high / 1080p	6−7	12−14
ultra / 1080p	4−5	8−9
4K / 2160p	3−4	7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 80% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	75−80	90−95
medium / 768p	40−45	50−55
ultra / 1080p	18−20	27−30
high / 768p	30−35	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 30% more, than FireStream 9270.

Full Specs

	FireStream 9270	GRID K240Q
Architecture	TeraScale	Kepler
Code name	RV770	GK104
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	13 November 2008	28 June 2013
Pipelines	800	1536
Core clock speed	750 MHz	745 MHz
Transistor count	956 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	30.00	95.36
Floating-point performance	1,200.0 gflops	2,289 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	3600 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	115.2 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	4.1	5.1
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		3.0

FireStream 9270 vs GRID K240Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares