FireStream 9270 vs GRID M6 8Q

When choosing between FireStream 9270 and GRID M6 8Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9270 and GRID M6 8Q.

FireStream 9270

GRID M6 8Q

Main Specs

	FireStream 9270	GRID M6 8Q
Power consumption (TDP)	160 Watt	100 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI	No outputs

FireStream 9270 has 60% more power consumption, than GRID M6 8Q.
FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID M6 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GRID M6 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GRID M6 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 28 MHz higher, than GRID M6 8Q.
FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GRID M6 8Q - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 1412 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	5−6	18−20
ultra / 1080p	2−3	10−11
QHD / 1440p	2−3	5−6
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	14−16	35−40
medium / 1080p	7−8	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	10−11	27−30
ultra / 1080p	8−9	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	21−24	60−65
medium / 1080p	10−12	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 184% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	130−140	220−230
medium / 768p	100−110	190−200
ultra / 1080p	50−55	110−120
QHD / 1440p	27−30	75−80
4K / 2160p	12−14	40−45
high / 768p	75−80	160−170
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 100% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	50−55	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 41% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	80−85	110−120
medium / 768p	55−60	100−110
ultra / 1080p	30−35	75−80
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 73% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	7−8	21−24
ultra / 1080p	5−6	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	5−6	7−8
low / 720p	16−18	45−50
medium / 1080p	8−9	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	7−8	27−30
ultra / 1080p	0−1	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	110−120
medium / 1080p	18−20	65−70
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 150% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	10−11	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
QHD / 1440p	−	10−12
4K / 2160p	8−9	−
low / 720p	21−24	60−65
medium / 1080p	12−14	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 193% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	50−55	95−100
medium / 768p	−	85−90
high / 1080p	10−12	35−40
ultra / 1080p	5−6	14−16
QHD / 1440p	−	5−6
medium / 720p	45−50	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 117% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	3−4	10−12
ultra / 1080p	1−2	9−10
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	10−11	35−40
medium / 1080p	5−6	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 260% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	90−95	110−120
ultra / 1080p	80−85	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 25% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	6−7	−
ultra / 1080p	2−3	14−16
4K / 2160p	0−1	−
low / 720p	27−30	65−70
medium / 1080p	10−11	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 153% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	10−11	35−40
medium / 1080p	9−10	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 180% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	21−24	65−70
medium / 768p	14−16	40−45
high / 1080p	6−7	21−24
ultra / 1080p	4−5	12−14
4K / 2160p	3−4	7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	75−80	90−95
medium / 768p	40−45	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	35−40
high / 768p	30−35	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 47% more, than FireStream 9270.

Full Specs

	FireStream 9270	GRID M6 8Q
Architecture	TeraScale	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	RV770	GM204
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	13 November 2008	30 August 2015
Pipelines	800	1536
Core clock speed	750 MHz	722 MHz
Transistor count	956 million	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	30.00	69.31
Floating-point performance	1,200.0 gflops	2,218 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	3600 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	115.2 GB/s	160.4 GB/s
DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.1	6.4
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		5.2

FireStream 9270 vs GRID M6 8Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares