FireStream 9270 vs GRID M60 2Q

When choosing between FireStream 9270 and GRID M60 2Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9270 and GRID M60 2Q.

FireStream 9270

GRID M60 2Q

Main Specs

	FireStream 9270	GRID M60 2Q
Power consumption (TDP)	160 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI	No outputs

GRID M60 2Q has 40% more power consumption, than FireStream 9270.
FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID M60 2Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
FireStream 9270 and GRID M60 2Q have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GRID M60 2Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 193 MHz higher, than GRID M60 2Q.
FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GRID M60 2Q - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID M60 2Q is 1412 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	5−6	35−40
ultra / 1080p	2−3	21−24
QHD / 1440p	2−3	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	14−16	60−65
medium / 1080p	7−8	40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 500% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	10−11	55−60
ultra / 1080p	8−9	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	35−40
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
low / 720p	21−24	100−110
medium / 1080p	10−12	60−65
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Battlefield 5 is 423% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	130−140	250−260
medium / 768p	100−110	220−230
ultra / 1080p	50−55	180−190
QHD / 1440p	27−30	110−120
4K / 2160p	12−14	70−75
high / 768p	75−80	210−220
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 160% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	50−55	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	80−85	120−130
medium / 768p	55−60	110−120
ultra / 1080p	30−35	100−110
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Dota 2 is 101% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	7−8	45−50
ultra / 1080p	5−6	40−45
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	5−6	14−16
low / 720p	16−18	80−85
medium / 1080p	8−9	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Far Cry 5 is 487% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	7−8	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	55−60	180−190
medium / 1080p	18−20	110−120
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Fortnite is 328% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	10−11	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	−	30−35
4K / 2160p	8−9	24−27
low / 720p	21−24	100−110
medium / 1080p	12−14	65−70
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	50−55	140−150
medium / 768p	−	120−130
high / 1080p	10−12	70−75
ultra / 1080p	5−6	30−35
QHD / 1440p	−	21−24
medium / 720p	45−50	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 260% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	3−4	24−27
ultra / 1080p	1−2	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 720p	10−11	65−70
medium / 1080p	5−6	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	90−95	130−140
ultra / 1080p	80−85	−
medium / 1080p	−	120−130
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Minecraft is 46% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	6−7	−
ultra / 1080p	2−3	14−16
4K / 2160p	0−1	−
low / 720p	27−30	100−110
medium / 1080p	10−11	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 253% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	10−11	65−70
medium / 1080p	9−10	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 420% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	21−24	130−140
medium / 768p	14−16	85−90
high / 1080p	6−7	45−50
ultra / 1080p	4−5	24−27
4K / 2160p	3−4	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 520% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	75−80	90−95
medium / 768p	40−45	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	50−55
high / 768p	30−35	60−65
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in World of Tanks is 59% more, than FireStream 9270.

Full Specs

	FireStream 9270	GRID M60 2Q
Architecture	TeraScale	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	RV770	GM204
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	13 November 2008	30 August 2015
Pipelines	800	2048
Core clock speed	750 MHz	557 MHz
Boost Clock		1178 MHz
Transistor count	956 million	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	30.00	150.8
Floating-point performance	1,200.0 gflops	4,833 gflops
Length		267 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	3600 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	115.2 GB/s	160.4 GB/s
DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.1	6.4
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		5.2

FireStream 9270 vs GRID M60 2Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares