FireStream 9270 vs HD Graphics 5000
In this comparison between FireStream 9270 and HD Graphics 5000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9270 will be the best choice, for others HD Graphics 5000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9270
HD Graphics 5000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 5000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 5000 here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | HD Graphics 5000 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 433% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 5000.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and HD Graphics 5000 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and HD Graphics 5000 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and HD Graphics 5000 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 550 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 5000.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and HD Graphics 5000 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Battlefield 5 is 180% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 5000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 30% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 5000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Dota 2 is 32% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Fortnite is 46% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Forza Horizon 4 is 160% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Grand Theft Auto V is 60% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Minecraft is 8% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 5000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 30% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 233% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | − |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 366% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | HD Graphics 5000 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
| Code name | RV770 | Haswell GT3 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 5 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 40 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 1,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 22 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 44.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.80 |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |