FireStream 9270 vs HD Graphics 530
When comparing FireStream 9270 and HD Graphics 530, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9270 and HD Graphics 530 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9270
HD Graphics 530 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 530 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 530 here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | HD Graphics 530 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 64 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 966% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 530.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and HD Graphics 530 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- HD Graphics 530 has 62 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and HD Graphics 530 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and HD Graphics 530 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 400 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 530.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and HD Graphics 530 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Battlefield 5 is 55% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 530 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 530 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Fortnite is 16% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Forza Horizon 4 is 62% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Minecraft is 6% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 530 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | HD Graphics 530 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Gen. 9 Skylake |
| Code name | RV770 | Skylake GT2 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 5 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 24 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 27.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 403.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.97 |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |