FireStream 9270 vs Iris Graphics 6100
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9270 and Iris Graphics 6100. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9270 and Iris Graphics 6100. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9270
Iris Graphics 6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 6100 here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Iris Graphics 6100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 966% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 6100 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 6100 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Iris Graphics 6100 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 450 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 6100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Battlefield 5 is 27% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Far Cry 5 is 14% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Fortnite is 7% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Forza Horizon 4 is 15% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Grand Theft Auto V is 27% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| FireStream 9270 and Iris Graphics 6100 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Minecraft is 6% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 9% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Iris Graphics 6100 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
| Code name | RV770 | Broadwell GT3 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 5 January 2015 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 52.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.80 |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |