FireStream 9270 vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
When choosing between FireStream 9270 and Iris Plus Graphics 655, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9270 and Iris Plus Graphics 655.
FireStream 9270
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3/DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 966% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 450 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 107% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9270 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 58% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 45% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 112% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 85% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 106% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 60% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 140% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 16% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 133% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 120% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 42% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
| Code name | RV770 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 1 September 2017 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 50.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.103 |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |