FireStream 9270 vs Iris Pro Graphics 580
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9270 and Iris Pro Graphics 580. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9270 and Iris Pro Graphics 580. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9270
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 580 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9270 | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 64 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 966% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 has 62 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 400 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 57% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Battlefield 5 is 46% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 26% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Dota 2 is 21% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Fortnite is 42% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Forza Horizon 4 is 46% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Minecraft is 5% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than FireStream 9270. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9270 | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Gen. 9 Skylake |
Code name | RV770 | Skylake GT4e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 November 2008 | 1 September 2015 |
Pipelines | 800 | 72 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 350 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 72.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.97 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |