FireStream 9270 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7
When comparing FireStream 9270 and Iris Xe Graphics G7, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9270 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9270
Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9270 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Battlefield 5 is 153% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 80% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 38% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 63% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 162% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 121% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 160% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 220% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 25% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 146% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 160% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 45% more, than FireStream 9270. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9270 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | RV770 | Tiger Lake Xe |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 November 2008 | 15 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 800 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 4.1 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9270 vs GeForce 930MX
- FireStream 9270 vs FirePro V5900
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce 930MX
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs FirePro V5900
- FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GTX 770M SLI
- FireStream 9270 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 770M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000