FireStream 9270 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
When choosing between FireStream 9270 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9270 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
FireStream 9270
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9270 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 350 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 283% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 253% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 120% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 51% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 91% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 275% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 196% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 230% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | − | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 9−10 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 160% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Metro Exodus is 340% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 35% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 184% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 220% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 280% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 50% more, than FireStream 9270. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9270 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | RV770 | Tiger Lake Xe |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 November 2008 | 15 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 800 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 400 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 4.1 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9270 vs GeForce 930MX
- FireStream 9270 vs FirePro V5900
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce 930MX
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs FirePro V5900
- FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- FireStream 9270 vs Radeon R9 M395
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M395