FireStream 9270 vs Quadro K4000

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9270 and Quadro K4000. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9270 and Quadro K4000. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

FireStream 9270

Quadro K4000 Check Price

Main Specs

	FireStream 9270	Quadro K4000
Power consumption (TDP)	160 Watt	80 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	3 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
		Check Price

FireStream 9270 has 100% more power consumption, than Quadro K4000.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro K4000 has 1 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Quadro K4000 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K4000 is 60 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K4000 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K4000 is 2016 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	5−6	14−16
ultra / 1080p	2−3	8−9
QHD / 1440p	2−3	3−4
low / 720p	14−16	27−30
medium / 1080p	7−8	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	10−11	21−24
ultra / 1080p	8−9	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	21−24	45−50
medium / 1080p	10−12	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Battlefield 5 is 115% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FireStream 9270 and Quadro K4000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	130−140	200−210
medium / 768p	100−110	170−180
ultra / 1080p	50−55	90−95
QHD / 1440p	27−30	50−55
4K / 2160p	12−14	30−33
high / 768p	75−80	130−140
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 69% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	50−55	55−60
ultra / 1080p	18−20	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	80−85	100−110
medium / 768p	55−60	90−95
ultra / 1080p	30−35	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Dota 2 is 49% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	7−8	16−18
ultra / 1080p	5−6	14−16
4K / 2160p	5−6	5−6
low / 720p	16−18	35−40
medium / 1080p	8−9	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	7−8	21−24
ultra / 1080p	0−1	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
low / 720p	55−60	90−95
medium / 1080p	18−20	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Fortnite is 92% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	10−11	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	7−8
4K / 2160p	8−9	−
low / 720p	21−24	45−50
medium / 1080p	12−14	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 106% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	50−55	80−85
medium / 768p	−	70−75
high / 1080p	10−12	27−30
ultra / 1080p	5−6	10−12
QHD / 1440p	−	2−3
medium / 720p	45−50	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 73% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	3−4	9−10
ultra / 1080p	1−2	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	10−11	24−27
medium / 1080p	5−6	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Metro Exodus is 160% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	90−95	110−120
ultra / 1080p	80−85	100−110
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Minecraft is 26% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	6−7	21−24
ultra / 1080p	2−3	16−18
4K / 2160p	0−1	−
low / 720p	27−30	50−55
medium / 1080p	10−11	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 133% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	10−11	24−27
medium / 1080p	9−10	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	21−24	50−55
medium / 768p	14−16	30−35
high / 1080p	6−7	16−18
ultra / 1080p	4−5	10−11
4K / 2160p	3−4	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 140% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	75−80	100−105
medium / 768p	40−45	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	30−35
high / 768p	30−35	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than FireStream 9270.

Full Specs

	FireStream 9270	Quadro K4000
Architecture	TeraScale	Kepler
Code name	RV770	GK106
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	13 November 2008	1 March 2013
Pipelines	800	768
Core clock speed	750 MHz	810 MHz
Transistor count	956 million	2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	30.00	51.84
Floating-point performance	1,200.0 gflops	1,244 gflops
Length		241 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	3600 MHz	5616 MHz
Memory bandwidth	115.2 GB/s	134.8 GB/s
DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	4.1	5.1
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		3.0
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)		0.21 kh/s
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		61 Mh/s
		Check Price

FireStream 9270 vs Quadro K4000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares