FireStream 9270 vs Quadro K4000M
When choosing between FireStream 9270 and Quadro K4000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9270 and Quadro K4000M.
FireStream 9270
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro K4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4000M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9270 | Quadro K4000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 60% more power consumption, than Quadro K4000M.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K4000M has 2 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Quadro K4000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 150 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K4000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 800 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Battlefield 5 is 69% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9270 and Quadro K4000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 41% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Dota 2 is 29% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Fortnite is 57% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 39% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Minecraft is 12% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 80% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in World of Tanks is 30% more, than FireStream 9270. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9270 | Quadro K4000M | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Kepler |
Code name | RV770 | N14E-Q3 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 13 November 2008 | 1 June 2012 |
Pipelines | 800 | 960 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 600 MHz |
Transistor count | 956 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 48.08 |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 1,154 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 2800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 37 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9270 vs GeForce 930MX
- FireStream 9270 vs FirePro V5900
- Quadro K4000M vs GeForce 930MX
- Quadro K4000M vs FirePro V5900
- FireStream 9270 vs Radeon RX Vega 11
- FireStream 9270 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000
- Quadro K4000M vs Radeon RX Vega 11
- Quadro K4000M vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000