FireStream 9270 vs Quadro K4100M
In this comparison between FireStream 9270 and Quadro K4100M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9270 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K4100M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9270
Quadro K4100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4100M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9270 | Quadro K4100M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 60% more power consumption, than Quadro K4100M.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K4100M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K4100M has 2 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K4100M - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Quadro K4100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 44 MHz higher, than Quadro K4100M.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K4100M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 400 MHz higher, than Quadro K4100M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Battlefield 5 is 92% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9270 and Quadro K4100M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Dota 2 is 40% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Fortnite is 78% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 93% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 52% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Metro Exodus is 140% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Minecraft is 16% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 125% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in World of Tanks is 38% more, than FireStream 9270. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9270 | Quadro K4100M | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Kepler |
Code name | RV770 | N15E-Q3-A2 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 13 November 2008 | 23 July 2013 |
Pipelines | 800 | 1152 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 706 MHz |
Transistor count | 956 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 67.78 |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 1,627 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 102.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 51 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |