FireStream 9270 vs Quadro K5000M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9270 and Quadro K5000M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9270 stacks up against Quadro K5000M, check out specs charts below.
FireStream 9270
Quadro K5000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K5000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K5000M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9270 | Quadro K5000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 60% more power consumption, than Quadro K5000M.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K5000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K5000M has 2 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K5000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Quadro K5000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 44 MHz higher, than Quadro K5000M.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K5000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 600 MHz higher, than Quadro K5000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Battlefield 5 is 153% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9270 and Quadro K5000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 80% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Dota 2 is 63% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Far Cry 5 is 162% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Fortnite is 121% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 146% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Metro Exodus is 220% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Minecraft is 25% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 166% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 170% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in World of Tanks is 54% more, than FireStream 9270. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9270 | Quadro K5000M | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Kepler |
Code name | RV770 | N14E-Q5 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 13 November 2008 | 1 June 2012 |
Pipelines | 800 | 1344 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 706 MHz |
Transistor count | 956 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 67.31 |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 1,615 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 51 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |